@repjustinamash WPA doesn't require prior approval for mil action. 48 hour notification, 60 days to act w/o auth, another 30 to w.draw.
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang Not true. Read it: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 ….3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash I have, and Dellums v. Clinton, as well as Campbell v. Clinton. plain text only part of meaning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang That's nonsense. The text is the meaning. It's not ambiguous.http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 …2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash It does not require attack on US but "where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash You need to find Lou Fisher, formerly of Library of Congress and have a convo with him about constitutionality.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang Framers were clear. Constitution is clear. And WPR is clear. So what that it's been violated before? It's still illegal.
-
-
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash It's meaningless unless you can bring your will to bear on exec branch.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.