@repjustinamash WPA doesn't require prior approval for mil action. 48 hour notification, 60 days to act w/o auth, another 30 to w.draw.
-
-
@repjustinamash I have, and Dellums v. Clinton, as well as Campbell v. Clinton. plain text only part of meaning. -
@MiekeEoyang That's nonsense. The text is the meaning. It's not ambiguous.http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 … -
@repjustinamash It does not require attack on US but "where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances" -
@repjustinamash Look, I'm with you that Congress should take a more proactive role in governing armed conflict. -
@repjustinamash But I worked for people who have been in your position & been unsuccessful at stopping Presidents under WPA.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@repjustinamash You should also read the following sections: 1543 & 1544, esp. 1544(b) -
@MiekeEoyang Those sections account for sec 1541(c)(3): when Pres uses defensive force w/o approval as emergency response to attack on U.S. -
@PNauticExpress Wikipedia is not a binding or relevant legal authority.@repjustinamash -
@MiekeEoyang@repjustinamash I'm just showing you the technicalities being leveraged. -
@PNauticExpress Correlation, not causation.@repjustinamash
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@repjustinamash Is single-handedly defending the#Constitution re:#Syria. Where is@SpeakerBoehner & the others?#teaparty#tbrsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.