FYI @repjustinamash & others: The definitive (so far) history of the #War #Powers #Resolution: http://www.loufisher.org/docs/wpr/430.pdf …
@AlanTonelson Simply no reason to read War Powers Resolution in this contradictory way. Other sections are accounting for sec 1541(c)(3).
-
-
@repjustinamash Sorry for delay in responding. (Arrival of bedtime!) So the Louis Fisher study is wrong? On what basis?#war#powersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@repjustinamash Also a lots of#war#powers wiggle room in 1541's ref to "situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly>>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@repjustinamash <<"indicated by the circumstances." -
@AlanTonelson Still has to be U.S. national emergency. Bottom line is there's no need to pretend sec 1541(c) doesn't exist. It's consistent. -
@repjustinamash Greatly appreciate your willingness to debate in public. But isn't the uber-question: If Congress really intended the>>
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.