Uh, no. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-33 … RT @ChrisAloA: @HayesBrown @repjustinamash War Powers Act requires us to be attacked.
-
-
Replying to @HayesBrown
.
@HayesBrown @ChrisAloA Mr Brown, you did actually read what you linked to, right? Here's a hint: Sec 1541(c). (Oh, and the Constitution.)9 replies 16 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash @ChrisAloA Actually, Congressman, I did miss that line. Mea culpa.1 reply 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HayesBrown
.
@repjustinamash To follow up, then, if strikes illegal under WPA and courts ruled only Congress can stop them, what next?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HayesBrown
@HayesBrown Nondefensive strikes are illegal under Constitution. WPR is consistent w/ Constitution in that regard. Congress should vote.3 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
.
@repjustinamash As only Congress can respond to WPA violations will you put forward new legislation to block Admin action in SY?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@HayesBrown I have supported & voted for legislation & amendments to block funding absent congressional authorization.
-
-
Replying to @justinamash
@repjustinamash@hayesbrown two of my favorite tweeters in the same conversation?!0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.