.@repjustinamash the sequester avoidance bill (had mand. spending cuts) does bind future congresses: http://1.usa.gov/11Xolue
-
-
@repjustinamash mandatory spending cuts are permanent and don't need to be re-upped. Your fear is more apropos to discretionary spending. -
@RyanLEllis Yes, but the law can be changed. The only *guaranteed* cuts are ones that happen now. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.