Not "I voted for a tax cut for billionaires that adds over a Trillion dollars in U.S. debt funded by money borrowed from the Communist Government of China"?
-
-
-
If we stopped governments being able to borrow against future taxes & the Fed printing money on demand, none of this would happen.
-
Perhaps it would be worthwhile, even prudent, to consider. The environment and variables are vastly different today than 200+ years ago.
-
Turns out the economic laws of Supply/Demand/Price, and their reverberating effects when combined with debt/liabilities haven't changed much in behavior since the first barter exchange between humans.
-
I’ll have to take your word on that for now. At least for a start, I’d like to see our government given debt limitations rather than the current blank checks it has.
-
I agree - and the max allowed should ideally be $0 ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Constitution requires you to act as a co-equal branch of government and check on the executive. You are failing to do that, so can you really own that word, congressman?
-
He’s been trying, but it takes more than one congressman to do that...
-
He hasn't tried hard enough. He should leave the Republican party and publicly explain why. If he doesn't, he is complicit in failing to uphold his duty under the Constitution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good one! Mine is subsidiarity,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well that narrows it down to Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, or yourself
-
Rand Paul is more Russian than American
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Or never trumper. It’s so funny how he has you establishment guys in a tizzy. And I didn’t vote for this guy. It’s been very entertaining though. And our economy is on fire.
-
Did you just call Justin Amash establishment that's fucking hilarious
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nope! The answer is “brick” which is what you leave 24/7 on the NO button in Congress.
-
Because most bills that are voted on should be a no vote from anybody who takes the Constitution seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Justin wins.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gotta be more specific. Every Republican talks (
) about the Constitution.
"Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution..." would be your giveaway.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With a dash of disenfranchisement and a sprinkle of let’s ignore the equal protection clause because I stand on the necks of minorities and women to get into Congress.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.