As a constituent, I think you owe me an answer to this question: Whose account of Russian election interference do you believe: Vladimir Putin, or American intelligence services? Don’t be vague. Answer the question.
-
-
-
American. That’s not exactly a difficult question, and it largely misses the point. Our main concern should be the president’s bizarre behavior with respect to Putin. We’ll have to see what Mueller finds, if anything.
-
Kevin, how fortunate you are that your elected rep actually cares enough to respond to his constituents. Wish I could get Ted Cruz to answer a phone call, tweet or snail mail. This is what leadership looks like!

-
You’ve got a great rep in Beto O’Rourke. Vote for him.
-
Will do and am just getting started as a volunteer on the texting team.
#BetoForTexas - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wow, if only you were a member of a co-equal branch of government capable of checks and balances on the executive branch that could hold this President accountable.
-
Michael, what exact brand of gov-magic are you suggesting Justin use, beyond his single voice, vote, and ability to draft legislation, all of which he already does?https://twitter.com/csuwildcat/status/1018916431193255936?s=19 …
-
Jumping into the thread, he could have voted for Russia sanctions, instead of opposing them on the grounds of some obscurantist libertarian rationalization. (His buddy was up front that his vote against sanctions was pro-Trump.)
-
Your "obscurantist" label is BS - the bill granted broad, nonspecific power to do all manner of things to any company that does business with a Russian business, even if the exchange is benign and above reproach.
-
Can you direct me to the section authorizing 'broad, non-specific power(s)'? I read the headings and I see "sanctions with respect to" cybersecurity, crude oil projects, Russian and other foreign financial institutions, corruption in the Russian Federation, 1/
-
transactions with foreign sanctions evaders and serious human rights abusers in the Russian Federation, persons engaging in transactions with the intelligence or defense sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation, development of pipelines in the Russian Federation, 2/
-
transfer of arms and related materiel to Syria. Seems pretty darn specific to me. 3/3
-
And as usuals when confronted with facts they go silent.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
DUDE - come on. You know what you saw during that press conference. Where is your patriotism? Trump basically committed treason because, make no mistake, we are at WAR here. Will you stand up? What side of history are you on?
#PaperBallots#MondayMotivation#TreasonSummit -
18 U.S. Code § 2382 "Misprision of Treason" - Read the Full
#Indictment - https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2018/07/Muellerindictment.pdf … -
Treason only applies to wartime. When leftists like you over react and scream treason, it divides us. Trump should have reprimanded Russia, but to say its treason is ridiculous.
-
You think we aren't at war? What do you call it when a hostile gov't hacks our systems, steals data, manipulates and weaponizes said data? This is no joke.
-
Then why didnt Obama bomb China for hacking govt computers in 2014?
-
-
I didnt say anything about Clinton. I get it. You're pissed that your partys' server got hacked. But you folks are usually anti war. Now you're ready to launch against Russia over this?
-
And you're busy defending a country that attacked us? Make no mistake junior, data warfare is warfare.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
