Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
justinamash's profile
Justin Amash
Justin Amash
Justin Amash
Verified account
@justinamash

Tweets

Justin AmashVerified account

@justinamash

US House candidate, MI-3

I defend #liberty and explain every vote at http://facebook.com/justinamash  • 'Laws must be general, equal, and certain.' —F.A. Hayek

Third District of Michigan
Joined January 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      Since many people continue to unwittingly promote socialism with their misguided insistence that "every tax cut is good," I'm going to illustrate why a TARGETED (e.g., just for one entity) tax break is welfare, economically equivalent to a subsidy, and a cost to other taxpayers.

      81 replies 348 retweets 1,150 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      Imagine a state with only three people: Al, Bo, and Cy. Each person pays $4 in annual taxes, so the government collects $12 total. The government spends all that money providing services. It distributes services equally among its residents and is required to balance its budget.

      5 replies 19 retweets 113 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      Suppose the government wants to attract a new person, Di, to the state. The government is excited about all the business Di will bring, so it promises Di that her annual taxes will be only $1 if she makes the move. Di is thrilled and accepts the offer.

      1 reply 16 retweets 102 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      Now the state has four people. The government collects $13 in taxes ($4 + $4 + $4 + $1) to be spent on services. But because government services are distributed equally, Al, Bo, and Cy now receive only $3.25 each in services ($13 / 4), even though each still pays $4 in taxes.

      3 replies 18 retweets 106 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      In other words, Al, Bo, and Cy now get less for each tax dollar; their effective tax rate has gone up, thanks to the government's special break for Di.

      2 replies 17 retweets 115 likes
      Show this thread
      Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
      US House candidate, MI-3

      Suppose the government attempts to maintain government services at the level provided prior to Di's arrival, i.e., $4 per person in services. Since the state now has four people, the government will need to collect $16 in taxes. It currently collects $13.

      3:00 PM - 30 Jun 2018
      • 15 Retweets
      • 96 Likes
      • victor ALangston13 ϟF Josh Houslander Apollo Ross Brad Bailey Neko A. Perdomo Justin E. Lane Mr. Libertarian Marc Goldwein
      2 replies 15 retweets 96 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Di's annual taxes are fixed at $1, so the additional $3 will have to come from Al, Bo, and Cy. Consequently, Al, Bo, and Cy will have to pay $5 per person in taxes, to receive $4 per person in services, thanks to the government's special break for Di.

          1 reply 17 retweets 105 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Even if the government convinces Di to bear some of the additional tax burden, or finds another way to raise revenue, if any portion of the $3 comes from Al, Bo, and Cy, they will pay more in taxes than they receive in services, thanks to the government's special break for Di.

          1 reply 15 retweets 96 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Meanwhile, Di is living large. She is paying only $1 in annual taxes while receiving $3.25 to $4 in government services. The difference is a welfare subsidy to her, no less than if the government forced Al, Bo, and Cy to write her a check or hand her some cash.

          2 replies 17 retweets 111 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          The fact that Di is receiving services paid for by others rather than dollar bills from others does not make the transfer any less a welfare subsidy.

          1 reply 18 retweets 122 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          What about the claim that Di's arrival will boost the economy and more than pay for her special tax break? Many of the proponents of this view seem unaware that they are advocating central planning, a main tenet of socialism. To see this, let's return to the illustration.

          4 replies 16 retweets 132 likes
          Show this thread
        7. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Advocates of Di's special tax break are saying that, ALL ELSE EQUAL, they would rather give Di a very large tax break (75%) than give everyone a modest tax break. In other words, they believe that government central planners can outperform the market by shifting money to Di.

          3 replies 15 retweets 126 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          If your reply is "give others a tax break, too," then you've missed the point. You can't give others a tax break AND hold all else equal. The budget must be balanced; government spending would have to be cut. The relevant analysis is how best to tax at a GIVEN level of spending.

          4 replies 18 retweets 125 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          We could rerun this illustration at a much lower level of government spending, and the relevant analysis again would be how best to tax at this level of spending: Is it best to give one person a very large tax break or to give everyone a modest tax break?

          2 replies 18 retweets 99 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          For a primer on why the free market is superior to central planning, read this: https://fee.org/articles/the-use-of-knowledge-in-society/ …. In short, keeping more money in the hands of everyone produces better economic outcomes than giving a special advantage to one person.

          7 replies 59 retweets 203 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          When advocates of Di's special tax break talk about the economic growth and jobs it will create, they commit the broken window fallacy: https://fee.org/articles/the-broken-window/ …. They ignore the break's opportunity cost; the government has deprived Al, Bo, and Cy of a tax break. That's a net loss.

          2 replies 27 retweets 127 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          We can imagine variations of this illustration. For example, maybe Al, Bo, Cy, and Di already live in the same state, and then the government gives Di a special tax break for "economic development." The end result, however, is the same: The special break is economically harmful.

          3 replies 14 retweets 92 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          This illustration is not meant to suggest that humans can design a perfect tax code. But when the government intentionally gives a special tax break to one entity, not only is the government undermining the Rule of Law, but it also is knowingly harming the economy.

          7 replies 28 retweets 141 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Bottom line: Targeted tax breaks are bad.

          19 replies 41 retweets 278 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Justin Amash‏Verified account @justinamash Jun 30
          US House candidate, MI-3

          Happy birthday, Frédéric Bastiat!

          16 replies 40 retweets 322 likes
          Show this thread
        16. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Mikael Waernlund‏ @Wenmigao Jun 30
          Replying to @justinamash

          But targeted Tax Breaks are not Socialism. Historically it has been used more by capitalists. However, there are numerous examples of Tariff-free trade zones, where attracting business has resulted in tremendous growth. The whole Chinese miracle is a result of that.

          1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
        3. 1 more reply

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info