.@juliehdavis, I worked transition and WH and @ChrisLu44 is correct. Messina then Gips. What were you referring to?https://twitter.com/chrislu44/status/799203010840645632 …
First Froman, then Messina, then Gaspard then Gips. Not comparing this to mass firings of 2day but there was turnover
-
-
1/2.
@juliehdavis@ChrisLu44, see your point BUT not sure agree w characterization , wouldn't describe Froman-Messina div resp that way andMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
2/2 and don't recall
@patrickgaspard as part of this sequence@juliehdavis@ChrisLu44. More later, got2 get back to book writing ;-)Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
That's an extreme mischaracterization of how we ran things. And no one was "replaced." Plus, look at our results
-
When some1 leaves a job they r replaced. & I'm not talking abt results here. We don't know Trump results yet either
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
? I served as assoc dir of personnel for transition from beginning to day I moved into WH position.
-
My piece noted Obama transition had several hds of personnel, Trump not 1st PEOTUS w turnover on team
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
what's this argument?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.