In light of today's DACA decision, re-upping the back story of why the Trump administration didn't give any policy reasons when it ended the program, one of the factors in SCOTUS' finding that doing so was "arbitrary & capricious." Elaine Duke refusedhttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/11/us/politics/supreme-court-dreamers-case.html …
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
Duke was deeply torn about the decision, as
@shearm & I documented in Border Wars. She agreed to end DACA, but would only refer back to then-AG Jeff Sessions' assertion that the program was unlawful. Sessions knew at the time that could weaken their case in the courts. 2/31 réponse 8 Retweets 10 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion
Trump was also deeply conflicted, as many Republicans warned him that ending DACA would be a disaster but his hardline advisers warned that *not* doing so would enrage his base. What will he do now? To understand how we got here, read the book!https://www.amazon.com/Border-Wars-Inside-Assault-Immigration/dp/1982117397 …
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.