horrifying that these things are even being framed as higher-level standards https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/border-funding-immigration.html …pic.twitter.com/FVzmxQYAx4
Afficher cette discussion
-
I am shocked by the wholly unnecessary apologist language
@juliehdavis and@ESCochrane included in their article to rationalize Pelosi's decisionhttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/border-funding-immigration.html …Afficher cette discussion
What language is that? The part where we note that she didn’t have the votes to get the bill through the House otherwise? That’s not an apology, it’s a fact.
-
-
Pelosi was every bit as stuck as McConnell would have been if she'd refused to advance either bill
-
There's an embedded assumption here that she had an obligation to pass a bill that never gets extended to the other side, and it strips agency from the Democrats
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.