We “pour”ed over Trump’s tweets & found many a mistake/misstatement/exaggerationhttps://nyti.ms/2lPVSUw
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Just one look and see a picture on my phone of your vegana
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Any lies in there perchance? Gotta be at least a couple of those, right?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
You left out that Trump doesn't write his own books. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Remember, though -- Trump isn't writing these books for *us.* He told us who the target audience is during the campaign. They are for his base -- the pour-ly educated.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
great article, but you should remove the line that corrects his statement that a figure is 7 percent when it’s really 6.7. Rounding off a number correctly is not misstating it. There are plenty of lies coming out of his mouth without having to slam him for correct roundingpic.twitter.com/cVUlslYVuN
-
In fact, as a scientist, you can go further and argue that unless it can be demonstrated that we know these figures to one-tenth of a percent precision (may be doubtful), the whole number version is actually the correct one and the 6.7 figure is false precision
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@KaraCalavera How about we pour ourselves a drink so we can pore over poor writing?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.