Julie DavisCompte certifié

Have you made a transcript available?

You got him on the record & wont release it, so what's the point of telling us? Also based on the 3rd tweet in this thread I assume it's as bad or even worse than we can imagine.

If u r not in the biz of misrepresenting why did you tell the country right before the election that the FBI had found now connections between Trump and Russia. Unforgivable.

If you identified yourselves as reporters for the N.Y. Times, how did you misrepresent yourselves? Do you really need prior permission for your precise media distribution methods? Censoring Miller's tone of voice, modulation, pitch, volume, speed of delivery is still censorship

Would you have done the same had the O White House decided that they didn't want you to use on-the-record audio from Valerie Jarrett? Or would the assumed lack of subsequent attacks have allowed you to go ahead as planned?

Unfortunately, with this administration, on this particular policy, you’ve caused the NYT to lose all credibility as an independent news org. Obviously you agreed to keep access as you stated in this tweet. There is no misrepresentation if the interview was on the record.

On record but nobody gets to read/hear what he said? Great journalism!

How is this not about access? You wanted to get him on the record. To keep that possiblelity open in the future, you decided to sit on the audio. You're a reporter. It's not your problem of the person your interview doesn't understand the rules.

Playing the refs works