I’m seriously confused. What authority do they have to deny use of the audio?
Actually @shearm & I interviewed Miller WH before last for our piece on the evolution of the family separation tactic, & after the fact, The Daily decided to do an episode based on that conversation. WH would not allow audio to be used.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, are we going to hear this audio or what? Wtf.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*week before last, that is...
-
Use the audio anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you don’t post it, shame on you. Please resign and find a different line of work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What stops you from running it anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Find a nonpartisan judge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Run the story with audio. First amendment. Let the chips fall where they may.
-
I recall a time when a VOA reporter had an interview w president of Haiti. Some of his comments were interpreted to be a call to arms. Some discussion btwn agencies about the segment or intv being dropped. Director of VOA stood his ground. First Am. Intv ran. No revolution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
what do you mean by “would not allow”? Why did you need WH approval? Did they simply make a request and you complied with it, or would you have been breaking a law by publishing it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.