If you don’t believe word choice is important, then perhaps journalism is the wrong profession. @PhilippeReines
I appreciate all the criticism, constructive & otherwise, of my & @maggieNYT 's word choices in this piece which is all about truth & how Trump manipulates it. If all you can focus on is the absence of 1 word that you want to see, perhaps journalism isn't what you're looking forhttps://twitter.com/PhilippeReines/status/1001485468712783872 …
-
-
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Your words say “appreciate” but your tone says “reject”.
-
this!!!!
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
This tweet is beneath you. Smug defensiveness is never a good look. Nor is calling educated readers unthinking rubes. Do better, please.
-
But I think they honestly do believe we're rubes.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
oh here we go again.. a
@nytimes reporter who has no self reflection when challenged on their inability to use the words LIE LIAR or LYING when talking about Trumps LIES. extra bonus points for the condescending and snide remark at the end of your tweet. -
I know right? They can use it freely when it applies to people with names that rhyme with Flinton.pic.twitter.com/tMQUo0gIdr
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
As a former journalist, this is a ridiculous response. It’s not the word (obviously), it’s the principle. Everyone is asking for clarification on your language usage/guidelines because NYTimes has been inconsistent. Your response only further invites the question(s).
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Sure. Write up that arson story without using the word "fire". "The building was destroyed by demonstrable heat sources."
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.