Interesting point, the y axis on these graphs is distorted, drastically increasing the diff in the plans. The spending in @PeteButtigieg's plan is less than the funding gap in @ewarren and several times less than the missing funds in @BernieSanders plan. #WinTheEra #PresidentPete
-
-
-
This version, reworked by
@BobbyHill4Pete, shows everything on the same scale:https://twitter.com/BobbyHill4Pete/status/1223019462292574209?s=20 …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Compared to Warren and Sanders, the proposals offered by
@PeteButtigieg are far more reasonable. Buttigieg has already offered a complete plan for funding the entirety of his agenda.https://www.forbes.com/sites/benritz/2020/01/30/four-days-before-iowa-which-democrats-promises-add-up/#7ca5888619a8 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It’s almost like Pete had an excellent economics teacher in high school...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Wow, those are amazing figures. Pete is brilliant.
#PeteforPresidentHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@PeteButtigieg proposes $7.6 trillion in new spending – a sum that’s less than the gap between Warren’s proposed revenues and spending. Buttigieg has also proposed over $200 billion more in offsets already and offered a complete plan for funding the entirety of his agenda.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I would add, "the proposals offered by Pete are far more WORKABLE." His funding plan undercuts Congress's ability to punt or vote down bills based on the "how will you pay for it?" canard.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Voters deserve to know what policies each cand. prioritizes and how they'd finance their agendas. PPI’s Center for Funding America’s Future has compiled a comprehensive review of tax and spending props. offered by 4 leading pres. cand to help guide votershttps://www.progressivepolicy.org/projects/center-for-funding-americas-future/how-the-democratic-presidential-candidates-would-fund-americas-future/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

$51 trillion - $23 trillion - L’Mao
$35 trillion - $26 trillion - $8 trillion
$6 trillion - $4 trillion - $2 trillion
$7.6 trillion - $7.8 trillion - 
NEW: As Democrats begin selecting their party’s nominee for president with the Iowa caucuses next week, voters deserve to know what policies each candidate prioritizes and how they would finance their agendas.