Editors: the people have spoken. They want links 

-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So true. Some may be reluctant to link to studies behind a paywall. But at least readers would get the abstract!
-
There's nothing wrong with pushing readers toward a paywalled link, some may actually want to buy something that they read, and learn that not everything is free. They might even end up subscribing to a newspaper.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Then it would ruin whatever narrative they are trying to promote
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They absolutely should link, but most people won't be able to get beyond the paywall.
-
Yes, Canada needs a 'Plan S' for publicly funded studieshttps://theconversation.com/all-publicly-funded-research-could-soon-be-free-for-you-the-taxpayer-to-read-111825 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Psssst: most don’t know how to read them, and are generally referring to some boiled down one-pager.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wished that had been fixed since the time of the ominous Wakefield's paper where he wrote " we proved "no" mmr-autism association ", but the media published every article afterward without the "no"!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Harder for them to drive a catchy narrative or headline when it can be called into question with a handy link and a critical capable reader
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unpaywalled versions please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
