Roberts would not have violated the law by reading the name of the alleged whistleblower. But he was right to exercise his discretion as presiding officer and decline to do so.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Doesn’t the second point destroy the first?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
His role is what was defined in the rules. He has cover. Should he speak up, maybe?. Will he, doubtful. He won’t break the rules even if it is to callout one side for cheating the system.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
That’s “AUTHORITARIANISM” that you hear creeping around at FOX. “Who cares what the judge says?”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.