There's a Danish proverb: "It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future." but it also seems difficult even if they're not about the future, as displayed here by Haldane.pic.twitter.com/Vf7a5OzJKD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There's a Danish proverb: "It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future." but it also seems difficult even if they're not about the future, as displayed here by Haldane.pic.twitter.com/Vf7a5OzJKD
Actually, that's Yogi Berra: “It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
I wasn't initially sure where it came from, and Yogi Berra may well have said it, but it turns out it's a good bit older than that: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/20/no-predict/ …
Learn something new every day.
QI is a great site -- if you don't mind having your beliefs about the origins of quotes shaken up regularly. 
Same with Enrico Fermi and net power from nuclear fission. https://intelligence.org/2017/10/13/fire-alarm/ …pic.twitter.com/205YWmzlMV
and fusion is still ... away
Oh man, I love the Wright brothers. Have you read The Wright Brothers by David McCullough, by chance? It's fascinating and quite well-researched.
And his brother Orville went on to invent popcorn so you can never know what will happen
“ai safety issues are decades away from relevance”
This page has a whole series of great quotes related to this:http://humanscience.wikia.com/wiki/Worst_Predictions …
The only way to predict the future is to invent it
That's why I won't be surprised if I get to get out of 'the simulation' tomorrow.
Is that a “thing? The great escape?
Yep. The Greatest! This is how I feel whenever I think about it:https://youtu.be/gw7XefyCj6c
Technological progress is easy to predict.
What will go to market at a price point and desirability to reach wide spread adoption, that’s the hard stuff. 
Progress in general, sure. Specifics, though?
A decade ago, I would have said #nanotech would happen in the next 20 years, and solving byzantine's general problem was a mathematical impossibility.
But #blockchain came out a year later, and we're still ~20 years from nanotech.
Nanotech was never anything other than hype and hype squared. There are hard physical limits on the fantasies of nanotech.
So you'd be willing to bet that, say, none of these five products; https://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news/newsid=44165.php … or substantially equivalent ones based on nanotech will have total market shares of over $10m by 2025?
So...If Wright is wrong, how can I trust anyone ever again? 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.