Judge says plaintiffs didn't articulate a specific injury, which is required for standing.
Show this thread
BREAKING: Texas federal judge rules that plaintiffs don't have standing, 127,000 ballots will be counted
-
-
-
Even if the plaintiffs did have standing, the judge says he would still count the votes. He says the tents qualify as structures.
Show this thread -
He also says the case is not timely. It's been going on since the summer and at least since September. And people have been voting for a couple of weeks. (The legal term for this is latches.)
Show this thread -
Judge says if he thought that the plaintiffs had standing, he would have enjoined drive-thru voting tomorrow, on Election Day. (He says a tent is not a building, which is required on Election Day.)
Show this thread -
Judge says he would not vote drive-thru tomorrow so he could be sure his vote counts. Orders the county to maintain records of what votes were cast via drive-thru.
Show this thread -
I don't always have breaking news but I do have a newsletter devoted to independent accountability journalismhttp://popular.info/subscribe
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fucking amazing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another day of celebrating something beyond comprehension this time a year ago
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
AHHHHHH.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.