It’s also true that the Founders were just *wrong* about some important things. Parties, partisan elections, a loyal opposition w a constant incentive to expose the incumbent’s wrongdoing— these are a more reliable route to accountability *overall* than relying on Virtous Men. 2
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
There is no democracy (no “republic” if you like) under modern conditions without parties. As far as we know, there can’t be. They didn’t know that in 1787. They knew a lot! They were trying new things! In important ways what they did was very impressive in the circumstances. 3
Prikaži ovu nit -
But they didn’t know this important one, and they wrote their turned-out-to-be-false model of how things would work into our exceptionally-difficult-to-amend Constitution and procedures. 4
Prikaži ovu nit -
Impeachment— not only impeachment, but we’ll focus on that— isn’t well-designed for a system of parties. There’s never been a successful removal of a president— and that’s not because there were no presidents who should have been removed. 5
Prikaži ovu nit -
It works OK for the removal of not-officially-partisan judges. But the executive is different. Nixon was chased out of office with the threat of removal, but under the very unusual circumstances that the GOP had been all but locked out of Congressional power for 40 years... 6
Prikaži ovu nit -
*and* when the parties were still in their Jim-Crow-based cross-cutting ideological muddle— a situation unlikely to be repeated and based on conditions we wouldn’t *want* to see repeated. 7
Prikaži ovu nit -
The Nixon case fooled us into thinking the impeachment procedure wasn’t basically broken, if only we had virtuous heroes in the Senate in the Goldwater mode... and so we get disappointed in the Lamar!s of the world for not living up to the Founders’ ideals. 8
Prikaži ovu nit -
But that’s just not going to be a reliable mechanism for executive accountability in a world of parties. We need to think about what such a mechanism could be. /fun
Prikaži ovu nit -
Ahem. "/fin." I don't need a special notation to mark the end of fun; I just need to be my usual spoilsport self.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
When you have a dedicated group (representing a minority of the population) that puts "party ahead of country, the rule of law, security of American elections against foreign influence" with assists from the judiciary, it would be difficult to design a gov that can withstand it.
-
This is a round about way of saying that in a democracy commitment to those institutions and the rule of law are mandatory. Without that commitment, how can they stand?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.