Jeremy Whitley

Plus we kind of have all of those already.

not on film just yet, but here's hoping.

Quite frankly, Cate Archer is Bond but better in every conceivable way. Morally, ethically, and performance as a spy.

I mean, the characters all exist, it's just a matter of getting them the same screentime/production value/advertising as the dudes.

At this point, Lara Croft might actually be more well known than Indiana Jones. So it's just Spider-Woman and Cate Archer who need movies.

I'd like a Tomb Raider movie that isn't terrible before we count that as even.

Okay, but Crystal Skull was worse than BOTH Tomb Raider movies AND skin cancer, so it cancels out a lot.

Indy has one horrible movie, on mediocre movie, and two solidly good movies. We need at least two solid Tomb Raiders to even that out.

I mean, if this upcoming Tomb Raider movie is close to the game and any good it should basically be Lady Indiana Jones

And Atomic Blonde is kind of a Lady James Bond, yes? Assuming its as good as it looks? WE'RE ON OUR WAY, FRIENDS.

I'd watch the shit out of Jane Bond.

#AtomicBlonde out July 28th.

I have seen it and it's action lives up to this. Get back to me on July 29th if the plot makes sense though. : )

I mean, I'm a little surprised to hear it has much plot. Most Bond movies are short there as well.

That's why it didn't bother me. And it saves the "reveal" until the end, so you don't have a bunch of time to be like "wait, but then-"

Why change established characters? Make new ones, don't be lazy, in in fact you should support existing original female characters

this is the laziest comment.

Why? I don't want a male H. Quinn or Lara Croft or Furiosa or Selene (Underworld) or Alice (Resident Evil) they're great

no, your comment is lazy

why?