.@jpodhoretz Both Wendy Davis & Ted Cruz claimed to oppose government health care intrusion. Davis had the added benefit of being honest.
-
-
-
@AdamWeinstein The fact that she was functioning as a pro-choice activist wouldn't have had anything to do with it, of course. - View other replies
-
.
@jpodhoretz Also, Wendy Davis was fighting a radical law change, not a cloture motion to consider a bill actually advanced by her party. - View other replies
-
@AdamWeinstein yes, that must have been it. -
.
@jpodhoretz You seem disappointed that reporters might ponder the stakes or a messenger's credibility when setting editorial priorities :( - View other replies
-
@AdamWeinstein I seem 52 years old and seem like someone who's worked in media for more than 30 years. - View other replies
-
.
@jpodhoretz And I'm grateful for that! You're privileged to have many outlets to whom you can offer different judgments on these matters. -
@AdamWeinstein hey if you weren't such a Commie I'd hire you
-
-
-
.
@jpodhoretz hey remember when Bernie Sanders' nonfilibuster against tax cuts for you was left off front pages & you had a sad? Me neither. - View other replies
-
@brianbeutler well, considering I didn't compare Cruz to Bernie Sanders, it seems moot - View other replies
-
@jpodhoretz procedurally, Sanders did the same thing Cruz is doing. Neither given front page treatment. This has nothing to do with Davis. - View other replies
-
@brianbeutler believe me, if Sanders had gotten front-page treatment, I would have found that entirely acceptable. -
@jpodhoretz maybe, but you suggest Cruz's treatment reveals bias, whereas I doubt you cared so much when same happened to Sanders in 2011. - View other replies
-
@brianbeutler Oy my God - Show more
-
-
-
@jpodhoretz well..wendy davis actually had a small chance at accomplishing something...cruz doesn't. - View other replies
-
@ChairMissing@jpodhoretz So it's our estimation of the "chances" of the filibuster's success that decides its coverage? Sounds ideological. - View other replies
-
@StephenDOliver@jpodhoretz and more importantly. he's not actually filibustering. So what are you really covering? -
@ChairMissing@StephenDOliver nothing. nothing to see here. move along. - View other replies
-
@jpodhoretz@StephenDOliver that was a serious question. What are you actually covering? -
@ChairMissing@StephenDOliver you're right. there's nothing to cover. what a brilliant observation. you've opened my eyes. -
@jpodhoretz@StephenDOliver i love your sarcasm, but tell me what the story should be. - View other replies
- Show more
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
John Podhoretz
Adam Weinstein
Brian Beutler
Brandon Smith
Stephen Oliver