"I published a paper... defending the study of race differences in intelligence. This topic arouses strong emotions. But... the job of philosophers is to confront issues dispassionately, guided only by reason and evidence..."
https://spectator.us/academics-get-paper-retracted-some-havent-read-nathan-cofnas/ …
@spectator @nathancofnas
-
-
"Environmentalists never predicted that the Black–White IQ gap would, after reaching one standard deviation, remain impervious to earlyeducation, adoption, massive improvementsin the socioeconomic status of Blacks, and the(apparent) waning of overt racism and discrimination.“2/10
-
" Mainstream media coverage of the race-and-IQ controversy almost always falsely claims that there is a consensus among the relevant experts that hereditarianism has been refuted." (p. 132) WTF? 3/10
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.