Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @joyofhaskell

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @joyofhaskell

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    After not doing any haskell for a year +. I am reading Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell to get back into it and it's been a lot of fun and it also is very enjoyable to read

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. stu 2019.

    loving how & teach validation using Applicative (rather than Monad) by taking readers on a thoughtfully devised & effective trek through the Haskell abstraction jungle, carefully signposted to eliminate any risk of getting lost

    Poništi
  3. 25. lis 2019.
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. lis 2019.

    Your chance to get a discounted "Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell" (by and )

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I started learning Haskell from Haskell Programming from first principles and got a lot out of it, but it is slow paced at 1200+ pages, after half of it I switched to "Finding Success and Failure", the site and the Haskell Wiki, which works out fine.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. srp 2019.

    It's a secret to everyone. An awesome Lens tutorial is hiding in 's Finding Success (and Failure) 🕺🏻

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. srp 2019.

    Just finished 's succinct "Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell". Exactly the intro material I needed to get my bearings in haskell-land. Also the last line in the book is my new life motto

    For an expression to be fully evaluated and for code to represent a program that can be executed, all parameters - both types and values - must be filled.  Generalization involves a deferral of some choice (such as whether to use Either or Validation) that must be decided eventually. The only purpose of a function is to be applied to an argument. All things that are made abstract exist only to be made concrete again.
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. lip 2019.
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. lip 2019.

    New book to read. So excited!

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. lip 2019.
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. lip 2019.

    Getting started in fancy transit.

    Poništi
  12. 29. svi 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 29. svi 2019.

    We've released the print version of Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell. We will be sending 10 copies, along with some other goodies, to this year's .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 25. svi 2019.

    The print version of Finding Success should be available soon. We wanted to make the fonts bigger, so we've ordered a second proof to make sure everything turns out fine. Assuming it does, it'll be available for sale on within the next few days.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 25. svi 2019.

    Since our first book is finished, we wrote a blog post to talk about it, its relationship to our other work , and what you can expect from the Joy family of books.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. svi 2019.

    Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell: Fall in love with applicative functors by Type Classes is the featured book on !

    Poništi
  17. 22. svi 2019.

    You can peruse the table of contents and index and read the preface in the sample PDF:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 22. svi 2019.

    And we're done, moved the progress marker on Leanpub up to 100%, that's the First Edition.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 21. svi 2019.

    The proof is feeling sufficiently magical, so we'll be getting it out there in physical form shortly.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. svi 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I like the approach taken by the authors of . They take specific subject and deep-dive it. Their recent book "Finding Success and Failure" exclusively focuses on how to handle errors/failures & builds on top of type classes like Functor, Applicative, and Monad.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·