.@SFDAOffice now messing with my requests by using the "catch-all" to withhold comms with judges based on burden. Why did it take him a month to reject in full my request instead of ask for narrowing within 10 days of receiving request per law? What happened last Friday...hmm...
-
Show this thread
-
He's able to try this because the Mayor continues to, by fiat, suspend portions of Sunshine Ordinance that normally ban the "catch-all". Unfortunately for Boudin, the total amount of records I've gotten from him is so extraordinarily small, he can't even cite the rule of reason!
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
The problem of course is that
@chesaboudin can now continue to stretch out records disclosure as much as possible to benefit himself politically. This is what agencies, Boudin or not, do when they realize public records releases are damaging to them.2 replies 7 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Remember what
@CalCities says. Finding records that may contradict a public official's narrative is in fact a "primary purpose[]" of public records.pic.twitter.com/IUsh0Ameso
2 replies 8 retweets 11 likesShow this thread
The timeline here is June 18 request. On both June 18 and June 22 they state a "voluminous" extension for 10 days. On July 7 (long after their deadline) MuckRock sent a reminder. Today they rejected in whole, and demand narrowing. What exactly was the process that took a month?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.