Does anyone else think "strictly on background" is a bit overused? Too many people use it even when the info is already public
@duncanrobinson Yes, I get that ALL the time. It doesn't mean anything. One for @lucykellaway I'd have thought.
-
-
@jotted@duncanrobinson@lucykellaway It makes the PRs feel important to divulge info "strictly on background", even when its on RNS. -
@RobinWigg@duncanrobinson@lucykellaway my favorite is when a well-informed source tarts up rumor as fact "on background"
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
@jotted@duncanrobinson What I love is when someone says: this is strictly off the record, and then says something too dull ever to print -
@lucykellaway@jotted@duncanrobinson See also: embargoed announcements where the content ensures the embargo will never be broken.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
: 2E59 A14F 698F EBBA