Joshua Wong 黃之鋒  😷Verified account

2/ Frankly speaking, interference in LegCo’s internal functions by the political organs of the CCP is not news to Hong Kong in 2020. Even if it violates Article 22 of the Basic Law, it is ironically no longer news to a certain extent.

3/ People mainly focused on crimes of "misconduct in public office". But I think they missed a very important - or possibly the most important - point, which is found between the lines of HKMAO's statement criticising Legislators for violating their oath.

4/ It directly questions the councillors' legitimacy and is an obvious attempt to pave the way to their disqualification. This is the key! I remember last year, during the extradition bill's quarrelsome twin committees fiasco*, the HKMAO had yet to make such accusations.

5/ Even when Pan-dem continued to host a committee meeting that the regime considered illegal, the act was not questioned as a violation of oath. It's obvious that State Council chose to mention this not even half year before the election to pave the way for forced intervention.

6/ They plan to disqualify councillors for not fulfilling their oath. Should the pro-democracy camp manage to take more than half the seats in in this September's LegCo election, the pro-Beijing camp will claim that a "constitutional crisis" is triggered.

7/ Even though nothing explicit has been stated, I will make this tactical prediction - if the pro-democracy camp is able to take over half of the council seats, and gets to veto one bill after another while Beijing sits idly by, then I will definitely be glad to bear witness.

8/ It's obvious though based on events in the past four years, any hope that Beijing will follow the rules and allow the Pan-dem run LegCo properly will be dashed. We have to prepare for the worst.