Joshua Wong 黃之鋒  😷Verified account

2. Police beat up passers-by, the government did not condemn nor did the police apologise. Protestors disrupted public order, the government condemned them strongly.

3. Police surrounded protestors to beat them up, the government turned a blind eye. Protestors surrounded police, the government condemned strongly.

4. Pro-police individuals tossed the PRC national flags in the garbage bins, the government did not condemn. One protestor threw a PRC national flag into the sea, the government said it was a challenge of the authority of the Chinese government.

5. White-shirt people holding batons walked past police, nothing happened. A black-shirt civilian passed by protesting sites, police accused him of having an extendable machete.

6. White-shirt mob got arrested, allowed bail and yet to be charged. Protestors got arrested, no bail allowed and were sent to court quickly. Is such selective condemnation and execution of the law reasonable?

7. I won’t tell you, it is fine for anyone to break the law because they have a noble cause. This is not rule of law. Similarly, if you tell me it is fine for police to break the law because they are trying to maintain order, I won’t agree it either. This is not rule of law.

8. Rule of law is everyone (protestors, police, gang members, civilians and high ranking officials) receives the same fair judicial process when they are suspects for breaking the law. This is the rule of law.

9. When the government is not treating everyone in the society equally, but selectively and arbitrarily prosecuted certain people, and turned a blind eye to others’ illegal actions, that is not the rule of law, but the rule of men disguised as rule of law.