2. The proper way for Mrs Lam to “kill” the bill is to invoke article 64 of the Rules and Procedures, to FORMALLY WITHDRAW the bill. However, she fully IGNORE this procedure in her speech.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3. But today she still refused to promise a formal “withdrawal” despite public outcry, has proved that Carrie Lam is a HABITUAL LIAR.
Show this thread -
4. ***The crux does not lie in the word play, whether “suspend” or “withdraw”, I think the key is whether she would Promise NOT TO initiate the bill again during her term. She has to make it clear.***
Show this thread -
5. She has responded NONE of the public demands. She insisted using IPCC, her appointed committee to investigate police abuse of power. But as former Chief Justice Andrew Li pointed out today, an independent inquiry is a necessary move to solve the current governance crisis.
Show this thread -
6. She has to stop prosecuting activists who participated in the protests — although she dropped the riot classification, DOJ can still sue the activists using riot charges.
Show this thread -
7. Our demand is free election because all governance crisis stems from the political inquality. We learned that the gov is planning to disqualify candidates again during District Council Election in November. I strongly oppose to further political screening.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Some of the media coverage does not appear to have picked up on this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.