-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Felicidades!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you explain why multiple completed and in some cases published trials reported as "no data" in your "meta analysis?"
-
Such an interesting group he tagged. Especially Topol...who would like us masked up with N95s and locked in forever.pic.twitter.com/AckzJtgr8D
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@EvidenceLimited what do you think of this?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is quite easily the worst analysis I've read in my life. Every single RCT not included in quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis for each RCT completely unfounded. Overemphasis on one faulty study(Soto). One included retrospective cohort study(ICON) listed as two.
-
This is the retrospective study, which was given most weight in the entire analysis. When published & peer received RCT's exist.pic.twitter.com/45gFNYMk5m
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is not peer-reviewed, therefore it’s useless
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.