Kripke's version of the private language argument is the only interesting version of it; and, imho, Chomsky's underappreciated detailed critique of it (in "Knowledge of Language") is by far the most trenchant
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I always say this but his rule-following skepticism is easily solved by standard inductive inference: if you agree on a rule today, you will likely agree tomorrow. Both latch onto the simplest model that represents the rule. 1/2
-
This rule-following skepticism is identical to Goodman's grue paradox and dealt with the same way - standard inductive inference from what seems to you like simple primitives.https://twitter.com/crabby_smales/status/1205523802677022720?s=19 …
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.