Suggesting that vaccines do more harm than the diseases they prevent is the very definition of antivaccine.
Do you consider every vaccine on the schedule safe and effective enough to force on unwilling recipients? If not, which ones would you exempt? YOU are the one trying to impose your opinion on everyone, so YOU have the burden of proof.
-
-
You didn't answer the question, and I'm not so easily distracted. Answer my question and I'll answer yours—but not before you answer. Which vaccines in the CDC recommended vaccine schedule do you consider safe and effective and why?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As if burden of proof means a jot to anti vaxxers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did anyone say “force on unwilling participants?” No. Stop fabricating arguments to argue against them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody is being forced to vaccinate anymore than anybody is forced to quit smoking. But we can stop your access to schools or other public facilities if you smoke in them. If you won’t follow basic public health regulations, you lose your right to use public facilities
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The real question is, do you consider vaccine preventable diseases safe and rare enough to force them on unwilling participants? The risk/benefit ratio of the vaccine is the only thing that matters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
C’mon Jane, it’s not a hard question
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
