Science is based on observations. One observation can destroy a beautiful theory. Real scientists try to disprove their theories, not to silence criticism of them.
You mean like the inquisitorial defenders of the CDC's Holy (and infallible) Vaccine Schedule?
-
-
Except that the vaccine schedule changes almost every year due to new evidence. You really aren't very good at this, are you?

-
She's executive director of the AAPS for pete's sake that should be everyone's first, second, and 984th clue
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Time to weigh in. I’m not affiliated with any organization in this thread, just pursuing objective facts that can have context & nuance. Can we all agree vaccines work for immunization AND they can have serious adverse reactions? Here’s one
#RealityCheck: https://youtu.be/ERu-CSTQGSI -
Everyone in mainstream medicine already agrees that clinical trials and postlicensing vigilance are required to measure vaccine risks, and that vaccines which aren't quite safe should not be on the market. Do you feel a particular serious risk hasn't been measured and is high?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Control Data Corporation never had anything to do with vaccines. Does the "MD" in your handle (in which you rejoice) stand for "misguided div"?
-
psst! Centers for Disease Control...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why do you persist in denying harm to patients? Japan changed to acellular pertussis a decade before US did--how many children got severe permanent brain damage from whole-cell vaccine in that time?
- Show replies
-
-
-
I agree: you’re not good at this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.