Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @jordwalke

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @jordwalke

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    29. stu 2019.

    My talk from is now published: React To The Future! First conference talk since revealing at JSConf in 2013 with .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 1. velj

    You can’t even make the joke “no they just created a new douchebag lol”. If you did, people would reply “You clearly havent tried them”. People who try them love them enough to not care what other people think because they’re that good and that’s what it takes to change a trend.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 1. velj

    Remember “Douchebag Bluetooth Headset Guy” meme? incredible how Apple was able to completely destroy that whole concept with AirPods. Great product design and gradually evolving the aesthetics from regular headphones. Bt headsets socially acceptable now - trendy even. Take note.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 30. sij

    Give developers fast laptops. But give app developers old/slow phones. “What do you mean it’s slow? It’s butter smooth on my iPhone 11!”

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Skia is merged and is powering Revery ! 🎉🎉 gives us: 🎨Vector graphics 🔍Fractional zoom 🔤Proper text rendering w/ subpixel LCD support 🚀Better rendering perf Thanks and for all the help to get this going. Wouldn't have happened w/o you!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 29. sij

    Why has no one built amazing terminal applications using c̶͇̻̤̪̫̹̈́̂̎r̵̞͔̹͈͎̲̾a̷͚̣͒̀͊̀̽͝z̷̰̖̝͈̮̮̒̽͒̔̍͛͗y̴͈̖̾̓̂͜Unicode rendering. I experimented a bit and got some really sweet looking sparklines and graphs. I’m sure you could do a lot more too.

    Poništi
  7. 29. sij

    I like the kind of people that publish their well organized dot files to Github.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij
    Astronaut on the moon: Waiting for the build to finish.

About to step on a banana peel: Checking Twitter.

*Astronaut flying off into space*
    Poništi
  9. 25. sij

    Blue light may not be as disruptive to sleep as once thought? Results from one experiment on mice vs. many anecdotes from friends claiming night shift/flux helped them sleep. Either way, why go and ruin a life improving placebo!

    Poništi
  10. 25. sij

    Urgent: Do not, I repeat do *not* eat bats until further notice.

    Poništi
  11. 17. sij

    Spin (by ): A new template based project creation tool for native Reason/OCaml. Take it for a ... spin! (The project branding is already off to a good start on this one)

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij
    Everything works in every browser. Except server rendering. Oops.
    Poništi
  13. 15. sij

    Let’s be clear.

    Poništi
  14. 15. sij

    Incrementalism and maximizing rampages are good things. If we don’t want one to trade off the other, we need to make the send/landing diffs as fast/reliable as possible. Even with the best stacked diff/land infra(FB), each costs 10-15 minutes minimum just in tooling time.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 15. sij

    Maybe that was optimal. Maybe the value of incremental single purpose changes were worth the fact that the improvement still doesn’t exist today. But is it always?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 15. sij

    Have you ever had a series of changes staged that would be improvements, but realized they aren’t part of the single purpose, and then backed out the changes because it would be too much work to sequence them “I’ll do it some time in the future instead”. I have.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 15. sij

    Code review is good even for non incremental diffs. And incremental is better, all else being equal. But all else is not always equal. There is a downside to insisting on perfectly sized/scoped diff sequences, especially from the most productive contributors.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 15. sij

    Allow me to clarify since some have misinterpreted. Code review of incremental, smaller diffs, is always always good. The question is whether or not, in some situations, the benefits of incrementalism are larger than lost value of velocity from domain experts w proven records.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 15. sij

    I have seen many big changes and new frameworks and a lot of times these things happen because one or two people are able to move really fast without their flow disrupted. I don’t know how to capture that for big refactors in existing production systems.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 15. sij

    Sometimes newcomers to a code base need to help others understand what they are trying to accomplish incrementally. Sometimes experts do too. Sometimes you have to let the expert go on a rampage. There’s no one size fits all. Have to use your judgement.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 15. sij

    I am all for many small single purpose diffs. But the reality is that sometimes it prevents a codebase expert from going on a rampage of improvements and features. Small well organized diffs are better but are they better than the changes not happening at all?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·