You know what else is problematically contingent: Social “science” & the conclusions & the opinions of a certain Jungian psychologist. SSHRC much?
'If opinion is always contingent," Menand asked, "why should we subsidize professionals to produce it?' also 'That English departments have contributed to this state of affairs is ironic to say the least.' The Chronicle publishes another spot-on article http://j.mp/2JIqF0i pic.twitter.com/rckI6G11f3
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
JBP, please do not! You already make complex things easier to understand. You are just like the best professor I ever had in college. You challenge us to think at a higher level. We should all have that challenge in our lives, otherwise we just sit still and fall asleep.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hi great. Is this your response to the article? Because it seems unrelated
End of conversation
-
-
-
"Ten thousand political radicals, in town for the weekend, spend money no differently than ten thousand insurance agents." Good stuff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of my senior level English classes for critical theory involved watching exactly 2.5 hrs of Madonna videos. It was at that point in time I realized I would have a difficult time selling my skilkset after University. I became an electrician, best financial choice I ever made.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The humanities function as the engine room of imaginative creativity in society. If we weaken that power plant, there are severe consequences, as history has demonstrated over and over again
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.