-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
to imply this is scientism is to claim there's no objectivity about our psychee, you're gonna really claim that?
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What sort of epistemic problems do you see? Are these general epistemic issues with science, like, you take exception to the periodic table? Or are these epistemic problems with the sorts of classification needed to do psychology? Episteme is just Greek for Knowledge, y'know...
End of conversation
-
-
-
Aristotle's On the Soul/De Anima/Para Psyche is a great introduction to the philosophy of psychology, keep in mind we call it "psychology" in part because Aristotle called it the "psyche," just like we call political science that because Aristotle wrote Politics...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How much differential calculus have you studied? I don't want to assume anything about you. Some of your positions take a lot of words to describe the entire foundation of calculus. Like, the ENTIRE point. We still use it. It's a net good for most humans.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He has a reading list on his website
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.