Whoa, progress!
"His generalisations about gender differences can sound kooky, and maybe some of them are." No, they are most certainly not. They are based on scientific research that is solid as it gets in the social sciences. Period.http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/12/not-all-he-says-is-defensible-but-jordan-peterson-deserves-to-be-taken-seriously …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"as it gets" Implying there's plenty of wiggle room but if you're looking for as definitive an answer as possible, then it's the one he's shown.
End of conversation
-
-
-
"Not all he says is defensible" - absolute bollocks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Of course it can. Why wouldn't it be is the real question?
End of conversation
-
-
-
To be fair, "scientific research" and "social sciences" does not equal being worthy of being taken seriously.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oh please, don’t you know journalists are the final knowitalls around.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lies, all of the Jung stuff is still shaky to this day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.