No, it's public. They changed the corporate name to Alphabet, and Google is one owned entity. Moreover, private companies are subject to the laws too.
Playing with the diversity fire burns Google ever-so-justly at both ends.... https://www.wired.com/story/new-lawsuit-exposes-googles-desperation-to-improve-diversity/?mbid=social_twitter_onsiteshare … via @WIRED
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The irony is that Capitalism will win in the end - always does. If Google and other majors want the best people in order to stay competitive, they'll gladly give up their diversity platform in favor of hiring on merit.
-
They will, in the end, follow the money.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Probably not while white dudes make up the majority of those working there. If there were less men than women, and less white ppl than of other particular racial groups; there would be obvious discrimination. For now; nah.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The political vortex pulls in a growing number formerly neutral corporations. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/02/opinion/dicks-guns-walmart.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region …
-
How to explain the hubbub? Chris Cole is like a character in a Michael Lewis bestseller -- a former USC Cinematography major turned volatility trader. Re: the pseudo-calm post-2008. "You can't destroy risk. You simply transmute that risk...and amplify it" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3m-o57sGnc …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because they're rejecting specific groups NOW. That's discrimination, no matter who they hired in the past. OK?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.