This guy gets it
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's not a moral quandary any more than it would be if there were a human driver. Your scenario is a no-win. Who would a human driver protect? Somebody gets hurt in your scenario, no matter who or what is driving.
End of conversation
-
-
-
We won't be able to nap in them, which defeats the point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That which reduces autonomous People is better for the ruling elite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
WARNING JORDAN PETERSON SCREECHING AUTISM AHEAD RUSTY IT IS DANGEROUS TO GO ALONE TAKE THIS *Rusty Cage receives Fedora* IT WILL HELP YOU FOR YOUR QUEST
End of conversation
-
-
-
But I heard that the law will be rewritten so that you can still get a DUI if you let the robot drive when your wasted. So what's the point?

-
Seriously? What is the use in driver-less cars then???
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.