Could someone please explain this to the rest of us...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because if you keep on creating ever overlaping categories in which to group people you get ti the individual
-
Yes, a very useful and elegant method of proof in the math: a proof by mathematical induction
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But what exactly is the difference between the postmodernist epistemology that underlies SJW identity politics, and the quasi-postmodernist epistemology you advocated with
@SamHarrisOrg and in your book Maps of Meaning? Aren't you just another kind of anti-Enlightenment activist? -
For clarity, by "with
@samharrisorg" I meant in the first Harris/Peterson podcast in which Sam clashed with and rather expertly exposed the hidden quasi-postmodernism within Peterson's buzarre epistemology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rejecting identity politics is a NOT a real position Certainly not a solution. But intersectionality presents an opportunity to deeamphasize identity divisions, whilst collectively emphasizing shared struggles across groups.
-
Identity politics just reinforces division.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Except, there's nothing funny about what's happening. I'd love to laugh it off but this is terrifying. It's like the French Revolution all over again. I'm waiting for them to bring back the guillotine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Another way of saying that is that it collapses on itself. Self destroying principle. Self destroying principles aren't true principles. It the same as saying there is no truth.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.