Yeah just because Jordan said it, it must be true right? Not necessarily, evidence itself is not absolute either, but the fact that they called them in, makes it more likely
"Called in 'security experts' " does not constitute evidence of credible threat.... Let me repeat that: "called in 'security experts' " does not constitute evidence of credible threat.https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/channel-4s-cathy-newman-trolled-over-gender-pay-gap-wgsc6bl0l …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They ought to call in a research expert next time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Welcome to the British press Jordan!! Keep up the good work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think it was making fun, watch the interview and you'll get it.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I think more organisation is needed to fight this harassment narrative nonsense. Can't have just you going at it or it looks bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Presumably it's an attempt by
@Channel4News to garner sympathy for poor old@cathynewman -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Could we see a copy of your 'security experts'
#RiskAssessment please@Channel4News for@cathynewman You know lots of#FakeNews about just now.. just to make sure the story is real.. Can you then@FactCheck it.. Ta
cc @jordanbpetersonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.