It's a fact that will be dismissed as hate speech by people who cannot handle uncomfortable truths.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
He's taking sides in a political debate which is ultimately not about individuals, sick or otherwise. It's about which party gets to impose their will on the other party. Nobody is debating that, perhaps, neither party should get to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I fail to see how this is a “hate fact.” It is a simple lit review. It is done all the time in all scientific disciplines. He should have run a meta-analysis to support his hypothesis and proven his conclusion a bit better.
-
"Hate facts" is being used sarcastically here
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Could you describe them and what they imply? Like female therefore this applies to you and vice versa. Also why it is important to know that this is true. Would be helpful to hear this clearly stated in short.
@jordanbpeterson
End of conversation
-
-
-
The only sentence I have ever encountered more convoluted than that was written by a Math PhD trying to prove that he was smartest of all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't care for these facts one bit, as they do very little to supporting favorite narratives.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is why politics that isn't about individuals is inherently corrupt and perverted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.