They seem to be unable to differentiate those fundamental differences.
Also, Damore did not say, that women were less "ambitious" than men, either. He said, specifically, that men had a higher drive for (socioeconomic) status. That's not at all the same thing. But why should exactitude matter, when writing for Scientific American?https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/943559796095033344 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That sounds like the same to me. I am obviously missing the point!
-
Men and women both have ambitions to achieve goals as can be demonstrated by the fact women out achieve men in academia. Men are more driven to have or possess things such as status, power, wealth as can be demonstrated by any rich list. On average, to avoid confusion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The big question is, if our positions are so abominable, why do people have to lie about them, to make them sound worse?
-
The next question is: why did I use so many commas?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's a matter of choice, not ambition. Most, if not all, of these companies are desperate to hire women in the stem fields to increase diversity. It's surprising not to see more women working for these degrees instead gender studies or other social degrees, but it's their choice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What document are you talking about here? Damore’s Google Memo? If so, my understanding is that the original is here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He just said a bunch of stuff science has already said but nobody wants to hear. Then got fired for it. When actually if we acknowledge those truths & act on them properly it would be good for everybody.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well they should be desperate to hire the most qualified I agree. I'm just speaking of the reality that they are much more likely to hire qualified women for the mere sake of virtue signalling especially leftist companies like Google or Facebook etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If someone told me my drive for socioeconomic status wasn't very high I'd definitely take that as a compliment. I've been asked why I haven't gone into more lucrative fields before and I always think why would I want to be a slave to those kind of jobs.
-
I know my choices have lead me to not earn nearly as much as I could but to me money isn't worth the type of lifestyle you need to succeed in those types of careers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.