wait for the yes, but... https://evolution-institute.org/article/on-common-criticisms-of-evolutionary-psychology/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It a shame to see them go down this path. The most influential text I ever read was
@sciam 'Understanding Nanotechnology'. It's one of the few books I've kept from university.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Horganism" at its worst, pandering to the SJW's who don't even read his work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When what one claims makes no sense the only option is to back it by lies hoping most won’t bother to discover the fraud. How have we landed at this place?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
dont worry they will edit the article for clarity just after its gone viral and stoked the flames.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@primalpoly you made the grade.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would I believe that a woman's choosiness in partner-selection is innate. They're smart enough to figure that pregnancy and childbirth brings vulnerability that needs protection. A hard man is good to find.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Darwin was sexist for what exactly? Marrying his first cousin?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Darwin/evolution is scientifically grounded. If a gender diff is true, then that's not sexist. Investing whether or not it's true is science, not sexism. Sexism is judging an individual prematurely, in a way not validated by science. Those are 2 completely diff things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.