You don't have to guess if you can read. It looks like it's the opposite: a policy against blocking speech, just as it sounds. https://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/7917490-dreschel-mcmaster-developing-anti-disruption-policy/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
You'll have to go back and give it the Peterson test.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a good start!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So does this mean the administation and/or faculty are under the (potential) penalties they are instituting. Better hope it doesn't come back to bite them. If ambiguous then what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basically a first step. I am so happy you handled it like you did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is disgraceful that a university wouldn't know about civilized behaviour. But that's progressive for you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anti-disruption is just common sense. That it is not the default stance at every university already is a tragedy in and of itself. Everyone should be allowed to disagree with a speaker, but no one should be allowed to disrupt the talk whilst it is taking place.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope so (and it seems like it). I mean they can protest outdoor - that's their free speech. But better than protests would be "debates" (dialectics). They would need to come up with someone actually capable of thinking for it to be constructive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where can we read that policy ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.