Save some ammo for the debate! :)
And most of the "soft skills" beloved by soft scientists can be accounted for by psychometrically/factor-analytically derived measures of conscientiousness and emotional stability. https://twitter.com/Rambunctious216/status/935410729515081728 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why not debate him yourself? Oh, cuz you're nobody.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I love how the intellectual foundation of postmodernist thinking seems to be: "Reality is subjective and open to interpretation. And my interpretation is by default correct." We might get more done if postmodernists accepted they might be wrong about the world.
-
You have no idea what post-modernism is. Jordan Peterson has deceived you. That sounds like a filthy (((Post-Modernist))) thing to do!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Relevance to this thread: Reality can (to a large extent) be quantified, science does it every single day. Except when the science does something a postmodernist don't like, then it's not valid science anymore.
-
"a postmodenist" is a great example of unquantified group-think, which given the Tweet wrapper is superbly ironic :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fuck, I always knew it was psychometrically/factor-analytically derived measures of conscientiousness and emotional stability all along! NO ONE BELIEVED ME!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How exactly does a BA in Chemistry qualify you to preach race-realism on Twitter? It seems college isn't what it used to be.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.