It’s true you should never lie. Now prove that truth scientifically. Can’t be done!
Hi, buddy. You know that the word "truth" or its equivalents existed long before the scientific revolution? True as the arrow flies. True as my heart. True like my true love's love. True like a true friend. True (and free) like our homeland. So what Harris meant was "factual."https://twitter.com/MohamedofShaban/status/935392250762317824 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ouch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Verily , verily I say unto you ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The perception of truth is not the same as the truth. The scientific method exists to weed out subjective qualities and the linguistic qualifications/abstractions. If truth is indeed subjective, why not apply this to your tweet, such that its "truth" is only subjective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Get shit on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you? If science can't measure it which appears to be the case, then you have no way of knowing. This "true friend" may only appear to be a true friend but could be anything but. Not all questions require an objective answer. Just because you can ask a Q doesn't make it one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren't those metaphors which are rather a proof for the fluidity of language?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't believe people are still on this. You've explained it pretty well, a few dozen times.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You end up in the humanities teaching women studies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, neither and both, really. Yes, you are re-defining truth to a non-standard definition, and Harris isn't. No, this isn't political - it's clear from context that you have a non-standard definition.
-
Indeed the reverse (SJW always project) only those with a political/rhetorical axe to grind suddenly find themselves blind to the context. That said your definition is epistemically naive. I forgive you, though, philosophy is hard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.