"Strongly doubts"? Is that more or less legally stringent than "a stretch"?
"Cossman strongly doubts that showing some clips as part of an academic debate would lead to a discrimination finding." Remember her? https://torontoist.com/2016/12/are-jordan-petersons-claims-about-bill-c-16-correct/ …https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/932782904530288640 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure why this is so difficult for media or any educated person to understand. There has never been a case of “human rights” agencies NOT over stepping and pushing limits to suppress speech they don’t like. That is what they do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could C-16 inadvertently spell the end for academic fellowships which are only open to women?https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mvxd4n/why-are-there-still-male-only-scholarships-in-canada …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, that’s reassuring...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is the remedy for not paying the fine? Not “correcting” the behavior? Not “going into training”? Not etcetering? Sheesh. Blockhead ? Did she really not get the point or is she malevolently attempting to further the goal of indoctrination by outright lying?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.