Yes - you now live in a country where one has to debate whether something is a thought crime or not. Let that sink in for the people who pretend it's not happening.
Let this sink in. A journalist DEFENDING C-16 says "Could presenting Peterson’s argument violate the Ontario Human Rights Code? Nobody knows for sure, but it would be a stretch." How reassuring: http://nationalpost.com/news/politics/what-the-wilfried-laurier-professors-got-wrong-about-bill-c-16-and-gender-identity-discrimination …pic.twitter.com/hRyr4evNWx
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is Canadian law similar to US law? Will the first few big court cases over C-16 create precedents that will determine the scope of the bill?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Peterson with the memes! Love it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is fucking lunacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You f*ckin todaso indeed:/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good ol Ricky knows it's better than most of these lunatics running the government
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is my reply to this tweet a form of documented tacit acceptance of JP's views on the pronoun issue? Not many links in the chain between what the grad student at Laurier did, and what we all are doing by associating in a public forum with JP...
-
Illegal, by the "standards" of the Ontario Human Rights Commission? It's a stretch :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Its quite similar to the Inquisition branding people as heretics.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.